Monday 11 October 2010

Stanford Prison Experiment

Have you heard of Stanford Prison Experiment?
I would like you to go through the description of it and then discuss the following questions.Moreover, watch the short films that discuss it.

Go to http://www.prisonexp.org/psychology/1
The questions:
1. What police procedures are used during arrests, and how do these procedures lead people to feel confused, fearful, and dehumanized?
2. If you were a guard, what type of guard would you have become? How sure are you?
3. What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards?
4. If you were a prisoner, would you have been able to endure the experience? What would you have done differently than those subjects did? If you were imprisoned in a "real" prison for five years or more, could you take it?
5. Why did our prisoners try to work within the arbitrary prison system to effect a change in it (e.g., setting up a Grievance Committee), rather than trying to dismantle or change the system through outside help?
6. What factors would lead prisoners to attribute guard brutality to the guards' disposition or character, rather than to the situation?
7. What is "reality" in a prison setting? This study is one in which an illusion of imprisonment was created, but when do illusions become real? Contrast consensual reality and physical or biological reality, and explain the implications of the following poem (by PGZ): Within the illusion of life,
Death is the only reality,
but
is Reality the only death?
Within the reality of imprisonment,
Illusion is the only freedom,
but
is Freedom the only illusion?
8. What is identity? Is there a core to your self-identity independent of how others define you? How difficult would it be to remake any given person into someone with a new identity?
9. Do you think that kids from an urban working class environment would have broken down emotionally in the same way as did our middle-class prisoners? Why? What about women?
10. After the study, how do you think the prisoners and guards felt when they saw each other in the same civilian clothes again and saw their prison reconverted to a basement laboratory hallway?
11. Moving beyond physical prisons built of steel and concrete, what psychological prisons do we create for ourselves and others? If prisons are seen as forms of control which limit individual freedom, how do they differ from the prisons we create through racism, sexism, ageism, poverty, and other social institutions? Extend your discussion to focus on:
* The illusion of prison created in marriages where one spouse becomes "guard" and the other becomes "prisoner"
* The illusion of prison created in neurosis where one aspect of the person becomes the prisoner who is told he/she is inadequate and hopeless, while another aspect serves as a personal guard
* The silent prison of shyness, in which the shy person is simultaneously his or her own guard and prisoner
12. Was it ethical to do this study? Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research? (The experimenters did not take this issue lightly, although the Slide Show may sound somewhat matter-of-fact about the events and experiences that occurred).
13. How do the ethical dilemmas is this research compare with the ethical issues raised by Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments? Would it be better if these studies had never been done?
14. If you were the experimenter in charge, would you have done this study? Would you have terminated it earlier? Would you have conducted a follow-up study?
15. How can we change our real institutions, such as Attica Prison, when they are designed to resist critical evaluation and operate in relative secrecy from taxpayers and legislators?
16. Knowing what this research says about the power of prison situations to have a corrosive effect on human nature, what recommendations would you make about changing the correctional system in your country?

Retrieved from http://www.prisonexp.org/discussion.htm, 11.10.10

7 comments:

  1. 1. The main point of dehumanization is stealing a person's identity. If you lose your name, your clothes, hairstyle, contact with family and friends, you feel totally lost, you forget who you are.
    2. I can't imagine that, but I suppose I would be a "good cup".
    4. First of all, I wouldn't apply to take part in this experiment. I feel I could stand it for a week, no longer.
    5. I think they felt isolated and they didn't believe in any exterior help.
    6. They weren't sure what the situation really was like. Also, it's easier to blame a person.
    7. These are parallel realities and you don't know which of them is more 'real'.
    8. No, it's not the core, but circumstances can shape or 'recreate' people. Identity is something that differs you from others.
    9. Women are less fragile than they seem to be I suppose ;-) About children - I think that "Lord of the Flies" is an answer.
    10. I can't imagine they would make friends ;-)
    11. Well, that could be a topic of an essay... Generally, in material prisons people are usually aware of being prison while in these psychological prisons rather not.
    12. It's hard to evaluate it. I wouldn't dare to take part in such a thing as a coordinator or in any other "safe" way. I would feel as I do something evil.
    13. Humiliation is always something evil.
    14. As I already have written, I wouldn't dare for such experiment. I would have qualms all the time I suppose.
    15. There are actions to change them taken by Amnesty International and other organisations. Maybe the most important thing is to make things public?
    16. In my country there's not much money to spend on jails. Perhaps alternative ways of punishment should be considered? Actually, I don't think that our prisons are so bad ;-) And, the prisoners are not innocent students...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree with Asia.
    1) The “mile stone” to dehumanization is losing people’s dignity and freedom. When somebody brutally steals our sense of freedom simultaneously take a bigger part of our humanity.
    Using the various methods of intimidation leads to easiest people’s manipulation.
    If you hear one thing constantly in the loop you will start to believe in that sooner or later.
    2) I couldn’t imagine myself as a guard so it’s hard to say what kind of guard would I.
    But probably there wouldn’t be such distribution your behavior mostly depends on mass behavior.
    3) Unfortunately didn’t understand the main sense of question 
    4) If I were a prisoner there would be no difference to me between enduring a punishment in normal penitentiary or penitentiary in that experiment.
    5) Weak will leads such behavior, chain reaction and then mass reaction. Also I can say action equals reaction. When guards putting the pressure on prisoners, prisoners want to protect themselves.
    6) The main factor is: uncertainty. System is only a system. The blame is always at the people’s site – implementators.
    7) There is more than one definition of reality. The reality is a kind of a hybrid between common people’s living.
    8) Identity is a way of existing. Is a people’s concept of who they are and how they related to others. Something that differing us from the others. During the circumstances and environment out identity could be shaping, forming or event evolving. There is a sad true that stupid people are more susceptible to manipulating, so I thing that identity (when you put a special pressure and methods) can be changed.
    10) There will be no friendship. That was a short experiment but trauma will exist to the rest of their life.
    11) To make long story short. Prisoners who serving the sentence by the crime they have awareness about that, if there is guilt, there is a punishment. Psychological prisoners don’t have such awareness and that’s dangerous.
    12) We can arguing about ethical and non ethical methods. In my opinion, if there hadn’t been non ethical methods in the past, our pharmacy and medical care wouldn’t have been so good today. Unfortunately non ethical methods give us a faster view on certain cases.
    13) It is a similar situation to “collection the mushrooms knowledge”. If somebody hadn’t eaten some mushrooms before, today we wouldn’t have known about differences between eatable and no eatable.
    I’m sure that somebody else would try to do that experiment, if there wasn’t any.
    14) I think that yes.
    There were mistakes that shouldn’t be taken. But then we wouldn’t be able to teach anything if we didn’t make mistakes.
    15) In my country is a strange situation about prisoners, jails and low.
    In my country there are cases that after a judgment, condemned person can live the court with an instruction “After few days please go to the nearest jail to serve a sentence”.
    In my country that person can leave the court free and never come back.
    In my country person who has an active judgment (convinced for a rape) can be a candidate on the highest public level (stand for a president).
    In my country I have to wait more than 9 years after the crime to observe the first step at solving the issue (Olewnik case)
    That is my country…can you show me your?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1 Police arrested those people, they did the realostic arest procedures, took the finger prints, gave them numbers and put them in cells.
    2 I would try to do my job the best I can and not use the power that comes with it.
    3 Humanity that was left in the"good guards" hearts prevented them from commiting the crime.
    4 I would never take part in this type of experiment, even for money.I would never made through it without a major break down. It was unhumain.
    5 Prisoner thouth that if they can rebel and win with the guard they can be in control. And on top. they didint think that anybody from outside world would help them.
    7There is no reality in prison settings.People creat that "new reality' for the conditions they are put in. we do ite every day by ourselfs depending on every day situations.
    8 Identity is who we feel we are.It is not hard to change someones idenity, you just have to know their week pints and know how to manipulate that person. You have to be strong by yourself to break someone.
    9 I does not realy metter who you are, in this condition almost everyone would break down. Only people who are evil by themself would made it through.
    10 I am sure they were shocked and ashamed of what they did. Some of them were angry that they were that such a thing happened to them. It was a trauma for all of the participants.
    11 There is almost no differance in between real prison and the phsycological one. The differance are the settings of it. there always is a victom and the "bed guy".
    12 Although the study was not ethical it was needed to be done for the knowladge we got after it.
    13 It was suppsed to be a simple experiment but it got out of the control. Peoples minds got demadged, but the studdies showed that an ordinary people can become very evil under sertain circumstances.
    14 Personaly I would have never done such a study and let the people suffer so hard. I would have definatelly end it befor it escaleted to such a horrible level.I think that not only the follow up is needed but a good recovery help for the participants.
    15 The change has to come from the top. Thers should be a system of control over the prisons and the guards should not work as a prison guards longer that "x" amount of time.
    16 Like I mention we should creat a control system,more phycological test done on a prions gueards and more phycological help for them. We should try to prevent the guards from becoming evil.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This topic is complex to say the least. After I heard about above mentioned experiment for the first time I was amazed that people may behave in such a way. It felt like something impossible, but the more I read and see I feel like this is more than one-time case. I like to think of myself as a person that can't be that bad, but who knows. There's a book called "Lord of the flies" that tells a story little like this one. There are kids that have survived a boat crash. They are castaways on an inhabited island. They start to live there by theirselves. They divide into two groups - one that tries to be good and others that start to hate the other ones. After a while the bad ones kill one of the good kids. It was a result of more and more hatred, greater and greater feeling of being a better one and feeling of having a power over the others. Sad story written by a guy who was a teacher.

    In other words, people have a tendency to glorify their authority. The sad fact is that probably anyone can do such things, but it's good to be aware of that fact and trying to do something about it. At least I hope so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. Such usual procedures as to put the hands up and to assume handcuffs in the presence of neighbors, that police use during arrests can lead people to feel very bad and confused. Loosing freedom, name, own personality make people feel not human any more.
    2. If I were a guard, I hope that I would be good and understanding guard.
    3. I have no clue..
    4. I completely agree with Asia - I would never apply to take part in this experiment!!! It was so cruel and exhaustive even for a look-out man like me!
    I am really sorry, I can not think more about this experiment right now. I have tried to answer all questions but this topic is so mentally hard for me that I can't pass it. I'd rather start to read next blog...

    ReplyDelete
  6. The illusion of prison created in marriages where one spouse becomes "guard" and the other becomes "prisoner"

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you so much as you have been willing to share information with us. We will forever admire all you have done here because you have made my work as easy as ABC 토토사이트, 안전놀이터

    ReplyDelete